The Jewish Revolts Against Rome (peter Shirokov And Dr. Eli Lizorkin-eyzenberg)

Jewish Wars RomeThe Jewish Revolts against Rome (sometimes called the Jewish Wars) were a series of small and large-scale armed conflicts between the Jews and the Romans that spanned almost two centuries. These wars provide the overall historical background for the understanding of New Testament texts.

(This text is an excerpt from an entry in Online Lexham Bible Dictionary by Logos Press).

The kingdom of Israel was situated along a major trade route to Egypt and Africa and throughout its history was dominated by a number of larger nations. The Roman Empire controlled Israel’s territories from 63 BC into the fourth century AD. Apart from the Greco-Roman dominance, this period of Israel’s history was characterized by substantial internal divisions: Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, Qumranites, Hellenists, Herodians, Samaritans, Proselytes, Galilean and Diaspora Jews (Josephus, Antiquities XVIII 1.2-6; Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History IV 22.7; Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho 80; Mark 3:6; Acts 6:1, 2:11, 9:29; Luke 10: 25-37, 17:11-19, John 4:1-40). Roman rule precipitated the emergence of newly-organized nationalistic revolutionary groups. According to Josephus, a radical Jewish movement of Zealots (ζηλωταὶ/קַנָאִים) believed that political and religious freedom for Israel should be achieved by any means necessary (Josephus, Antiquities XVIII. 1.6). Zealots, and among them the Sicarii (σικάριοι), were known for violent opposition to Rome (Acts 21:28). Unmoved even by death they were responsible for much of the unrest. (To make comment and to visit the original post, click HERE.)

The First Revolt

In the first century the tensions associated with Roman rule erupted into multiple violent conflicts in Israel and in the centers of Jewish Diaspora. A tax census of Quirinius triggered an uprising by Judas the Galilean in 6 AD (Josephus, Antiquities XVIII. 1.1; Acts 5:37; Eccl. Rabbah 1:11). The local population of Egyptian Alexandria rioted against the Jews in 38 AD for not properly honoring Emperor Caligula (Josephus, Antiquities XVIII 8.1). After an incident involving the construction of a pagan altar in front of the synagogue in the Judean town of Jamnia, Caligula ordered a statue of himself erected in the Jerusalem Temple, escalating the tensions (Philo of Alexandria, The Embassy to Gaius XXX 200-203; Josephus, Jewish War II 184-203, Antiquities XVIII 289-309). A messianic contender named Theudas attempted an uprising around 46 AD, but was quickly apprehended and beheaded by the Romans (Acts 5:36; Josephus, Antiquities XX 5.1). In 46 AD Simon and Jacob, the sons of Judah the Galilean, led an uprising in Galilee and were defeated by 48 AD (Josephus, Antiquities XX 5.2).

The First Jewish Revolt against Rome (66-70 AD) followed these smaller uprisings. It ignited with riots under procurator Florus and its exact causes remain uncertain. Most of the details that are known about this war come from Joseph ben Matityahu better known as Flavius Josephus. Josephus personally witnessed the revolt, having fought against Romans in Galilee. He defected and served Vespasian and Titus, later documenting the events he witnessed. According to Josephus the revolt was instigated by a minor disturbance between Jews and Gentiles in the coastal town of Caesarea. Florus’ brutality across Israel and appropriation of temple funds for Rome provoked the populace and made war unavoidable (Josephus, Wars of the Jews II 14-16).

The revolutionaries first attacked Jews loyal to Rome and then overpowered a Roman garrison stationed in Jerusalem, temporarily eliminating Roman control of the region. The governor of Syria, Cestius Gallus, was dispatched to restore order with thirty thousand troops. After a series of attempts he was defeated and was not able to retake Jerusalem. Emperor Nero appointed Vespasian to put down the Judean rebellion with greater force. By 68 AD Vespasian’s sixty thousand man army crushed the resistance in Galilee and along the Mediterranean. In December of 69 AD Vespasian became the next emperor and returned to Rome while his son Titus took over the military action (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History III. 4). Titus besieged Jerusalem in the springtime of 70 AD and by summer’s end the city fell and the Temple was destroyed (Josephus, Wars of the Jews IV 4). The Romans commemorated their victory by erecting the Titus Arch, which still stands in Rome. The nationalistic freedom-seeking spirit among many Jews was shaken but not fully crushed. Three years after the fall of Jerusalem some Zealots, their families and few Roman hostages (960 people), remained besieged inside the Masada fortress. When their defeat was immanent, refusing to be captured alive, the Zealot leaders reached a decision to end each other’s lives. (Josephus, Wars of the Jews VIII-IX).

The Second Revolt

The Second Jewish Revolt, also known as the Bar Kochba Rebellion (132-135 AD), was predated by a series of widespread hostilities known as the Kitos War (115-117 AD) during the rule of Emperor Trajan (Seder Olam Rabba 30; Mishna, Sotah 9:14). In the beginning of the second century Rome was at war with Parthia and some Jews started an insurgency campaign against occupying Roman forces. It is believed that Kitos War was named after Quietus, a general who led the campaign against the Jewish rebels in Mesopotamia. A Roman source reports that the fighting was widespread. The Diaspora Jews of Cyrene massacred two hundred twenty thousand Greeks. Egypt had an uprising as well and two hundred forty thousand Greeks were killed in Cyprus (Cassius Dio, Roman History 68:32). Some fighting may have taken place in Judea as well (Babylonian Talmud, Taanit 18b). Even after these widespread conflicts were settled significant nationalist aspirations lingered among many Jews, laying the foundation for future conflicts.

The historical sources for the Second Jewish Revolt are more fragmentary. They propose several possible reasons for the Bar Kochba Revolt: The Roman desire to rebuild the Temple and their sudden reversal (Gen. Rabbah 64:10), Hadrian’s design to turn Jerusalem into a Roman city with a temple of Jupiter (Cassius Dio, Roman History 69:12, 1-2) and Roman ban on circumcision (Augustan History, Vita Hadriani 14:2). Eusebius speaks of Hadrian building the Roman Aelia Capitolina on the ruins of Jerusalem as a consequence of the war (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 4.6). However, Aelia Capitolina coins were found in the el-Jai cave together with Bar Kochba coins which had to be minted prior to 135 AD. The presence of such coins prior to 135 AD suggests that Hadrian had these plans for Jerusalem even before the Bar Kochba Revolt began. The war may have been a preemptive action against Emperor’s plans. Though the exact reasons that triggered the Second Revolt remain uncertain, it is safe to assume that as before the hopes of national independence fueled the revolution. Bar Kochba’s Revolt began in the town of Modi’in. Centuries earlier the Maccabean Revolt against the Greeks (167-160 BC) which culminated with Israel’s victory and the rededication of the Jerusalem Temple began in this very town. The revolution was well planed, strategically executed and may not have needed specific triggers, but only an opportunity.

The Aftermath of Jewish Wars with Rome

The Revolts against Rome proved to be catastrophic for Israel and their significance cannot be understated. Since the days of Julius Caesar the Israelites and their unique way of life were officially recognized by the Romans. With an established center in Judea and influential Diaspora communities, the Jews were a recognizable cultural force in the Hellenistic world of the Mediterranean. (Josephus, Antiquities XIV 10. 2). Despite being conquered by Rome, Israel retained the rights to maintain their own worship system and was afforded a measure of self-governance. But the nationalistic struggle for greater independence from their conquerors drastically altered these circumstances. The wars devastated the Jewish population as countless lives were lost in battles, subsequent famine and sickness. Untold numbers of Jews were enslaved and hundreds of towns and villages were destroyed (Josephus, Jewish Wars VI. 9.3; Cassius Dio, Roman History LXIX, 14:1). The constant unrest was problematic for Rome as well. The expenditure of resources and Roman casualties were significant, complicating their internal power struggles and politics (Cassius Dio, Roman History LXIX, 14:3).

The full Roman administration of the region ended the Herodian dynasty and marginalized the Jewish elites. The Revolts decentralized Jewish worship and the absence of the Temple ended many internal sectarian disputes. A new class of Jewish leadership emerged, the sages whose prominence was based not on heredity, but on Torah expertise. This non-political leadership of Jamnia scholars laid a new direction for observant Jewish life without the Temple and priesthood. The destruction of the Temple in 70 AD and the leveling of Jerusalem in 135 AD was followed by a fierce official persecution and compulsory expulsion of all Jews from vicinity of Jerusalem (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History IV. 6). The course of Jewish life changed dramatically in Judea, the nationalistic aspirations of an independent state were crushed and remaining Jews were forced to relocate to Galilee or to major Diaspora centers. The Jewish followers of Jesus were also subject to Hadrian’s expulsion and the Jerusalem Assembly was dramatically transformed during the administration of its first non-Jewish leader Marcus (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History IV. 6). The establishment of the Roman Aelia Capitolina on the ruins of Herodian Jerusalem began a long chapter in the history of the region without meaningful Jewish prominence. As nascent Christianity began to gain prominence in Rome the city of Jerusalem slowly lost its influence as the historical and spiritual center of Jesus movement.

Many Jews of that era have pondered the deeper reasons behind these tragic events. The prior devastations announced by Israel’s prophets provided a precedent for Israel being chastised by the means of foreign conquerors (Neh. 9:30; Jer. 25:1-14; Is.10:5-6; 39:5-8). In the gospels Jesus lamented His rejection and persecution by quoting Psa. 69:4, “They hated me without a cause” (John 15:18-25) and even predicted Jerusalem’s ruin because her inhabitants did not recognize Him (Luke 19:4). In retrospect, the rabbis of the Talmudic era saw the destruction of the Temple as a sign of divine punishment, attributing it to inter-Jewish “hatred without a cause” (Babylonian Talmud, Yoma 9b). The third book of the Sibylline Oracles and the first fourteen chapters of Second Baruch written by Jews in the second century AD also saw divine punishment as the underlying cause of these tragic events.

About the author

Dr. Eli Lizorkin-EyzenbergTo secure your spot in our new course “The Jewish Background of New Testament” - CLICK HERE NOW

You might also be interested in:

Shanah Tova!

By Julia Blum

Who Was Melchizedek?  (3)

By Julia Blum

Join the conversation (20 comments)

Leave a Reply

  1. Abrantes G.A. Filho

    Obrigado Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg. e Peter Shirokov
    O estudo da história do povo judeu na época da diáspora e a importância da situação geográfica de Israel nas rotas comerciais é essencial para compreendermos o estudo da bíblia (Novo Testamento). Sem a História e Geografia ficamos perdidos no tempo.

  2. LEAKY MUTAHI KABURU

    THANKS VERY MUCH FOR THE INFORMATION…JUST A QUERY WHAT HAPPENED TO THE JEWISH COUNCIL LED BY JAMES BROTHER OF YESHUA OF NAZARETH? TODA ONCE AGAIN

  3. RamonAntonio

    I may have mentioned this before but I think it may be a good recommendation. The book “The Origin of Stories” by Brian Boyd is a great study in the importance of narrative towards human cognition development. As such, even though the book does not make an explicit tie, Scripture, as a collection of storied narratives begins to take a fresh new importance in this light. I recommend to anyone to take a look at this book regarding the quest accompanied by Dr. eli and this incredible forum of Jesus followers. Shalom!

  4. Carolyn Geiler

    Dr Eli, thank you for the informative article. I did not know about the Second Jewish Revolt of 135AD. I find Jewish history fascinating because of my relationship to our Savior Jesus Christ! I have enrolled for the Biblical Hebrew class and look forward to learning more! Shalom, Carolyn Geiler

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Carolyn, welcome to Jewish Studies for Christians! I know that your experience learning Biblical Hebrew with eTeacherBiblical will be a rewarding experience indeed!

      1. Peter Shirokov

        I have to applaud you second this affirmation, Carolyn. This is a wise decision. Biblical Hebrew will open many new horizons as you study.

  5. William Jose Gaitan Moraga

    hablo solamente español

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Hola William!
      gracias por comentar.
      Te sugieron ingresar al sitio en español, sigue este enlace:
      http://iibsblogs.wpengine.com/es/category/blog-es/

      Eli.

  6. RamonAntonio

    Excellent! This requires pondering and reflection.
    Notable are the following:
    1. The importance of Israel and Jerusalem for its location in an important trade route.
    2. The profound divide among the Israelites in factions so diverse that even being a Jew was probably a class definition among many and not a national unitarian trait.
    3. The tolerance granted by the Romans which was not sufficient to the Jews as a whole and caused the disruptions that ended in the revolts that ultimately caused their diaspora.
    4. The impact of the diaspora reality in the Jews themselves and in Christianity. It may be argued that the present we live in was in fact the result of the diaspora. And even a strong case may be construed that without the diaspora resulting from the aftermath of the revolts, a figure as Paul would probably not have been decisive for Christianity.

    Finally, the arch of Titus remains one of the testaments for Jewish faith as it depicts in its walls what has come to be the form believed to be that of the Menorah as a two dimensional tree like lamp which was looted from the Temple and presumable brought to Rome. Hasn’t anyone thought that perspective had not been invented and that the Menorah may have been a tridimendional lamp of six arms around a center one? After all. the picture engraved in Titus arch is not supported by anything and a two dimensional lamp would have been impossible to stand in a carriage without support.

    There is a lot to be studied…

    1. Peter Shirokov

      You gleaned some great conclusions… We really appreciate such reflective reading. This era is very important in light of understanding identity, Jewish and Christian. There are some earlier backgrounds that I hope to share in the future with the blog readers that would shed even more light on the matters you mentioned.
      As far as menorah goes, I am not an expert on this topic, but have you seen one in Jerusalem? It sits in the plaza of old Jewish quarter, behind some very thick glass, because it is actual size and made of gold. Very impressive and it is two-dimensional, but has a broad multidimensional base.

  7. Timothy-Thanks for your efforts.

    Thanks for your efforts. It is highly informative.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Thank you, Timothy!

  8. Stephen Lockwood

    Dr. Eli:
    Thank you and Mr. Shirokov for your very informative article. I had known about the Bar Kokbah rebellion, but not about the earlier ones. I guess I had glossed over the verses in Acts, like many of us, not really understanding what Gamli’el was talking about.

    This now sheds a light on why and how the High Priest and the Sanhedrin reacted to another “charismatic leader” gathering large groups of people, and causing unrest. Many followers of Yeshua do not know Jewish history, nor do they understand the enmity between the various sects in the Jewish society (like they are today). Nor are they aware that with each “war” many more Jews were killed by their own countrymen than were killed by the people they were revolting against.

    Thank you, again, for the excellent article. It will take more thinking and mulling over. LOTS OF INFORMATION.

    SRL

    1. Peter Shirokov

      You are exactly on point. Understanding the historical background and revolutions, uprisings, divisions and messianic leaders of the era helps one to see why Jesus and his disciples had such reactions directed towards them. It helps to see the skepticism of some and the fear of others. It was a very turbulent time and New Testament was not designed to tell these stories, so knowing the history fills some gaps in our comprehension of the events.

  9. Rolland

    Very informative article.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Thank you, Rolland.

  10. ruth hirt

    Enriching reading. Please my gratitude for your valuable efforts to bring the study on our pages. Thank you, I love it and to realize, we are approaching The Great Days ahead when we shall see HIM, be with HIM. Bless the L_RD G_D,

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      You are like Paul. Starting from some place and always ending in praise! 🙂

    2. Zelda

      Thank you for the historical account; oftentimes we read the New Testament in isolation without an understanding of events that shaped the lives and beliefs of our Jewish brothers and sisters. I would like to read or study more especially the events that led to Israel becoming an independent nation again

      1. Peter Shirokov

        I agree, history is an indispensable tool for any person who studies the New Testament. It helps us interpret the ancient events better. Glad this article was helpful.