Jesus As The High Priest In Heavenly Temple (rev. 1:10-13)

Jesus as the High Priest of the Heavenly Tabernacle in Rev. 1:10-13
(by Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg and Peter Shirokov)

10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s Day when I heard behind me a loud voice like a trumpet, 11 saying: “Write in a book what you see and send it to the seven churches—to Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea.” 12 I turned to see whose voice was speaking to me, and when I did so, I saw seven golden lampstands, 13 and in the midst of the lampstands was one like a son of man.

John saw his vision on the Lord’s Day (see comments to the previous section as to the identity of the day). John was looking ahead, when suddenly he heard a voice speaking from behind him. John compared the voice to the sound of a trumpet. It is not easy to imagine what trumpet sound is meant here. Is it an Israelite “shofar,” a trumpet made of goat’s horn? Is it a type of bronze trumpet also known in the Mediterranean region? It is not possible to tell what the sounds were that John actually heard, but the fact that he described it as a trumpet sound lets us know that the message John received was connected with how the trumpet was normally used – a call to prepare for action.

When John turned back to look in the direction of the voice speaking to him, he first saw the Temple menorah – a seven-branched lamp that was once located in the Holy Place in the Temple in Jerusalem. The presence of the Temple menorah showed John’s audience that his visionary experience took place, at least partially, in the vicinity of the heavenly temple/tabernacle, or, more precisely in the section of the temple that is known as the Holy Place. We read about the existence of the heavenly temple in Hebrews 8:1-5:

“Now the main point in what has been said is this: we have such a high priest, who has taken His seat at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens, a minister in the sanctuary and in the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, not man. For every high priest is appointed to offer both gifts and sacrifices; so it is necessary that this high priest also have something to offer. Now if He were on earth, He would not be a priest at all, since there are those who offer the gifts according to the Law; who serve a copy and shadow of the heavenly things…”.

The idea of a heavenly temple first surfaces in the books of Moses. Moses ascended Mt. Horev and received instructions for the construction of the tabernacle (mishkan), the tent of God’s presence when Israel was in the wilderness. As Moses did this, he was “shown” the temple in the heavenly realm (Ex 25:9, 40) and his job was to somehow reflect in the earthy structure what he had seen in the heavenly realm. Ezekiel 40 offers an elaborate vision of the heavenly temple that was yet future. The idea of a heavenly temple is also mentioned in the Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs, an apocalyptic Jewish work from the 2nd century BCE, and is quoted in several of Paul’ letters.[1]

And thereupon the angel opened to me the gates of heaven, and I saw the holy temple, and upon a throne of glory the Most High. And He said to me: Levi, I have given thee the blessings of the priesthood until I come and sojourn in the midst of Israel (Testament of Levi 5:1-3).[2]

The fact that the Son of Man walks among the seven heavenly lamps (menorah), means that he (Jesus), as the heavenly high priest, was the source of this revelation. In various Jewish traditions, the figure of Metatron, who is if not identical, is very similar to the Son of Man, acts as the high priest of the heavenly temple. This temple is located in close proximity to the heavenly chariot at the base of God’s throne.

We read in 3 Enoch 15B (also known as Hebrew Enoch or Sefer Hekhalot):

Metatron (the name means “the one next to the throne”) is the Prince over all Princes, and stands before him who is exalted above all gods. He goes beneath the throne of glory, where he has a great heavenly tabernacle of light, and brings out the deafening fire, and puts it in the ears of the holy creatures, so that they should not hear the sound of the utterance that issues from the mouth of the Almighty.

The writer of Hebrews expressed similar ideas to those found in the Qumran scrolls, namely that Melchizedek is the heavenly high priest (11Qmelch). We read in Hebrews 7:1-3:

For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, who met Abraham as he was returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him, to whom also Abraham apportioned a tenth part of all the spoils, was first of all, by the translation of his name, king of righteousness, and then also king of Salem, which is king of peace. Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually.

It becomes clear that here in the book of Revelation, the Jewish apocalyptic figure, who previously appeared in a variety of Jewish Son of Man and Metatron traditions, is in fact Jesus Christ – the eternal heavenly high priest. This connection in Revelation is intentional and definite.

[1] 1 Thess. 2:16 is a quotation of Test. Patr., Levi, 6:10; Rom. 12:19 is taken from Gad, 6:10; Rom. 12:21 is taken from Benjamin, 6:3; 2 Cor. 12:10 is a quote from Gad, 5:7.

[2] Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament, ed. Robert Henry Charles (Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2004), Enoch 108:15.

About the author

Dr. Eli Lizorkin-EyzenbergTo secure your spot in our new course “The Jewish Background of New Testament” - CLICK HERE NOW

You might also be interested in:

Abraham In Egypt (lech Lecha...

By Julia Blum

Lech Lecha – God’s...

By Julia Blum

Join the conversation (54 comments)

Leave a Reply

  1. Perek

    I’m sorry, you said to look in the comments for a previous section to learn about the identity of “the lords day”. I don’t see it here.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Look here

  2. José Hélder Saraiva Bacurau

    Shalom ISRAEL!
    Em quê tempo nós estamos?dentro da profecia?Qual será o próximo evento?
    Zacarias 12? e todas as nações se levantarão contra ISRAEL,JERUSALÉM será um cálice de tontear para todos os povos,e uma pedra pesada para aos povos ao seu redor.
    Olharão para aquele a quem traspassaram e chorarão como quem chora pelo seu unigênito,O ETERNO será glorificado e o que está escrito se cumprirá,pois os céus e a terra passarão mas a palavra do SENHOR jamais passará.
    C om certeza o SENHOR não fará coisa alguma sem primeiro revelar os seus segredos aos seus servos os profetas (Amós 3.7) .
    DEUS abençoe a ISRAEL!
    Maranata!

  3. Kat

    Coming from a” form of Judaism” background, I have always seen grace (the gift) as the Holy Spirit rather than forgiveness (the sacrifice) as the gift. Your article reminding me that Jesus as High Priest had to offer a sacrifice and a gift says the same thing to me. Am I supposed to combine both words (sacrifice & gift) into the word grace? If so, why?

    1. Jerry S.

      Kat, for Hebrew understanding of Gift/Sacrifice in the High Priest office, at any bible search engine look up; gift, offering, sacrifice, sin, peace, blood, burnt, heave, etc. single & in comb. and let the Ruach lead.

      I’ve found Christianity take Grace & use many definitions of it as a foundation for faith. I.e., Gen 2:7, every time we take a breath it is so(u)lely by G_ds Grace, nothing NT about it. The same w/ forgiveness.

      Also, any online search of “Levitical offerings” will provide more than you may want to know of the 5 types; Burnt, Meal, Peace, Sin and Trespass. Of these 5, Meal and Peace could be considered “gift” offerings, the rest deal w/ sin and forgiveness.
      J.

      1. Kat

        Jerry S, thank you. I think what I am finally figuring out is that the three (trinity) that I see in the scriptures is what John in Revelation describes as the number seven. In other words I was really seeing grace.

        1. Fred Aguelo

          Hi Kat,

          People usually see what they want to see. My suggestion, commune with the Holy Spirit in solitude. Just be still & just ask Him your questions & patiently wait for His answer. He has always taught me, both old & new things. The key to intimacy with GOD is “you will find Me when you seek Me with all your heart.”

          Enjoy!

          Fred

          1. Kat

            Dear Fred, I am at least 4 generation non-Christian non-Jew. I am not on a religious side. I brought grace up as bigger than just forgiveness at a church where I worked and I was told that in spite of the excellent job I was doing they liked the person who did a poor job. I brought up grace at a study group where I attended church and I was told I can no longer lead. So you see what I want to see is the truth. What I know is that the sacrifice and the gift that the High Priest offered is exactly why I can to Christ. What I am willing to admit is that sometimes I understand things that are only a glimpse of a bigger truth I grasp at.

  4. José Hélder Saraiva Bacurau

    Shalom Dr Eli !
    DEUS continue a te abençoar, e a te usar para sua Glória.

  5. Dren Spahija

    Dear Eli, hi.

    I have left my comments few hours earlier, but, i am not seing it.

    Peace and blessings,

    Dren.

    1. Prof. Peter Shirokov

      Dren, all comments are checked for spam and other issues manually. It may take some time for them to show up. 🙂

  6. Dren Spahija

    I have gone through Old and New Testament several times, especially through New Testament. I am a deep believer of Jesus Christ as the Son of Man and The Son of God. My testimony has several parts of my life and it probably goes through all of my life. By this, I consider myself Israel as a Jew considers the same, Israel. Biblical Christians and Jews are Israel, both. Jews are by DNA and by Jewish spirit Israel, but, also Christians are spiritually Israel and descendents of Abraham.
    I have gone through two online studies on The Bible, and one of the classes I had it was The Book of Revelation. This Book contains many, many details and of course it was very difficult to get everything from one class. Therefore, I have learned many thinks from this lesson.
    Interesting view and it was very useful, the more specific explanation on theme from Hebrew perspective, which I liked it very much. I am taking few parts, which came to me more interesting:
    1. Trumpet, of goat’s horn or bronze trumpet, but, the last explanation would be more direct, a call for action.
    2. The Voice came from The Holy Place of the of the heavenly temple/tabernacle.
    3. Confusing on the High Priest detail. If he were on earth, He would not be priest, since that is for men, not for God. (My opinion, Jesus was 100% Man and 100% God)
    4. The History of the idea for the heavenly Temple came from the time of Moses.
    5. The ties between Jesus, Son of Man and The High Priest, brings that Jesus was Him.
    6. Metatron “the one next to the throne” is the Prince over all Princes.
    7. Melichisedek is the high heavenly priest of the Most High God in this line.
    8. Book of Revelation tells that The Son of Man is Jesus Christ-the eternal heavenly high priest.
    It is nice perspective from Jewish point of view, which was new to me. I enjoyed it.

  7. Kat

    Is John 14:1-14 also a description of the menorah? I am trying to understand the word eternal vs earthly
    “without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually.”

  8. Deborah Mgedzi

    Thank you for the teaching. I love the whole thing about our Saviour, Jesus Christ. Amen

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Welcome to the forum!

  9. BENEDICTA NAZARETH

    Peter:
    You co-authored the article on Jesus the High Priest.
    It is a great article and very interesting.

    The writer of book of Hebrew as well has spoken on this same topic. As you know this book was written for the Hebrew Christians drifting away from Christian faith and returning to Judaism.

    I want to know if you will be teaching the book of Revelation. If so when?
    Benedicta Nazareth

    1. Prof. Peter Shirokov

      Dear Benedicta, A course on the book of Revelation is on our radar, but we are not ready to launch it any time soon. We have some more courses planned before we can consider this book for a formal course. For now we will be posting some select commentaries and thoughts. The more specific the feedback our readers provide us, them more we see what we need to address.

  10. Robert Fruehling

    Thanks Dr. Blessings and Shalom.

  11. Franklin Bermeo

    So you are saying that the heavenly sanctuary is eternal… and when Jesus entered the
    Holy of Holiest.. place… or is just a metaphor for Jesus..?

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      When Moses was “shown” the pattern of God’s dwelling, what did he see? The actual sanctuary in heaven the Jewish tradition asserts (quite rightly). He was to try to imitate and replicate what he saw on a small scale and in mobile format. So the original actuary (in my opinion) was always in heaven. In Exodus Israel just built a reflection of that heavenly one.

  12. Kostya

    Fascinating!
    Jesus is certainly the Great High Priest who is in heaven, but is Apostle John seeing a vision of Jesus in or near the temple? The text does not necessarily speak of a temple menorah, but επτα λυχνιας χρυσας seven golden lamp-stands (plural). Whenever the menorah is mentioned in the LXX and in the Letter to the Hebrews, it is in the singular, even though it was a seven-branched object. Jesus is standing in the midst of those lamp-stands which we take to be related to the seven churches mentioned.
    Jesus tells us that the lamp-stands are the seven churches (v20) and that He walks among the seven golden lamp-stands ο περιπατων εν μεσω των επτα λυχνιων των χρυσων (2:1)

    1. Prof. Peter Shirokov

      Yes the imagery is amazing. This is one of the features of Revelation that captivates so much.

      1. Kostya

        I agree, but I was not so much commenting on the imagery, but raising an exegetical question in the first sentence which has bearing on basing the thesis of Jesus as High Priest in Revelation from this passage. Sorry it was not made as clear as possible, but the comments have limited characters (which I think is an excellent idea) and I did not want to start another box.

        1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

          So… are you then disagreeing (which we encourage in the forum!) that the imagery of Jesus here is that of the Heavenly High Priest? Just clarify your point.

    2. Fred Aguelo

      Hi Kostya,

      Aren’t the prople of Yah the Temple of the Holy.Spirit? If so then Yeshua is walking among the Temples (churches).

      Fred

      1. Kostya

        Hi Fred,
        I am not sure what point you are trying to make. Are you saying that Rev 2:1 is speaking about the churches as temples as symbolised by the candlesticks (menorahs)?.

    3. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Kostya, you know I love and appreciate your comments I think you are wrong in the sense that you needed it to use the term “menorah”. Seven lamps is what we conventionally call menorah. But we are talking about the same thing even if we don’t say the “the word”!

      Am I out of my mind? 🙂

      1. Kostya

        Sorry that I did not make my point clearer. Neither of us are mad. I am saying that in Revelation it is speaking of seven lamp-stands- seven menorahs if you like. We are not told what they look like, and they may be seven menorahs with seven lamps each or just seven lamp-stands with any number of lamps. But the text does not bear out that there was just one menorah with seven lamps because then the singular word for lamp-stand could be used, like it is for ‘menorah’ elsewhere in the Bible, and because we are told that each represents a church and that Jesus walked among them.
        This would undermine your idea that Jesus appeared to John as a High Priest associated with the temple.

        1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

          Aha… I c. I disagree. I think it is just that seven lamps, which makese only one menorah :-).

      2. BENEDICTA NAZARETH

        Dr Eli
        God has raised you up for such a time as this. We are surely nearing the end and the return of our Resurrected Lord Yeshua is near. I see the prophecies of end time are being fulfilled rapidly. All I long for is to see all Israel welcome their long awaited Messiah who is now our heavenly High Priest. I hope more Jews who do not know the Messiah learn about the courses you offer and not just the Christians. True, we talk about the same thing but differently expressed. It is good that you want to help the Christians to think the Jewish way. We all need to go back to our roots.

    4. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      I see your hesitance. Here is an image for you… Imagine a really big menorah and Jesus walks in between its branches. As far as each lamp being a church it is analogical imagery no different than when Jesus says he is the door or the vine… Just a thought.

      1. Kostya

        I know what you are saying, but I just don’t see that the text says one menorah (if it even is a menorah), but seven. I am no Greek scholar, and I have heard that the Greek in Revelation is a strange sort of Greek, but I do not see ‘menorah’ referred to as ‘seven lamp-stands’ anywhere. It is always singular λυχνια (lamp-stand) in the Greek LXX.
        In Rev 1:13 the vision is of Jesus (presumably) standing εν μεσω των επτα λυχνιων in the midst of the seven lamp-stands. If it was one lamp-stand would it not say ‘in the midst of the lamp-stand’?
        But I can see that we will have to agree to disagree.

        1. Prof. Peter Shirokov

          Disagreements are good in my book. They force us to think! If you really want to have some fun with Greek I am going to toss some ideas out. There are two very similar-looking words at play here. And they are very easy to confuse! The first words is λυχνία, used here in Revelation for lamp. In LXX it is the word for “menorah”, the seven branched lamp stand. The word is feminine based on its ending. The second word is λύχνος and it is a little different because it is masculine though its meaning is very close to the first word. It is the equivalent of Hebrew “ner” a light source, or what we call a candle today. The menorah (lamp) or course consists of seven nerot (lights). This masculine noun is all over Torah in LXX and is in plural most often. λύχνος is all over the NT as well.
          Now it is very easy to confuse those words in Greek (λυχνία / λύχνος) especially for a person for whom it is not native. I confuse them all the time. Beyond that the ῶν ending is the same for nouns of all three genders in Genitive as far as I recall. The conjugated form of λυχνία and λύχνος would look almost identical with exception of one extra letter – iota – in the feminine noun (the masculine would not have it) See how confusing? It could be confusing for the writer and for the copyist as well.

          1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

            Fun 🙂

          2. Kostya

            Even more fun when you add φως (light) to the mix!

  13. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

    I am a Jew and I seek to follow Jesus. Other than that I refuse to be lebeled in any way.

    1. Galit

      Dr Eli, if you are a follower of Jesus how is it that you are permitted to spread you views on what I thought was a Hebrew learning site. Just wondering. Shalom Galit

      1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

        This blog is not about anyone’s personal faith. Though all of our contributors both teachers and students have theirs (whether they are Jewish, Christian or like myself outside of categories). This blog is about Jewish Studies relevant to modern Christian communities.
        We are part of an Israeli educational company that cares for great quality of its educational product and does not sensor on the matters of personal faith commitments as long as they do not outwardly offend people of other faith persuasions. It is a free educational environment.
        I hope you will enjoy it!

        1. Galit

          That’s cool 🙂

          1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

            I agree 🙂

  14. Lorthois

    Thanks. Explanation very clear !
    Shalom
    Danit

  15. José Hélder Saraiva Bacurau

    Shalom Dr Eli, com todo respeito ao senhor.
    Não concordo com a comparação entre o SENHOR JESUS e o lenda judaica do metatron,.
    Só as ESCRITURAS são totalmente inspiradas por DEUS e dignas de aceitação , e segundo COLOSSENSES1.15-23, JESUS é sem comparação com qualquer criatura,real ou lendária.
    JESUS disse: Em verdade,em verdade vos digo:antes que Abraão existisse,EU SOU.
    Medite em JOÃO 14.7-11.
    Shalom Israel!

  16. Robert Fruehling

    Dr. Eli. from your explanation are you possibly Messianic? Shalom.

  17. BENEDICTA NAZARETH

    DR ELI:

    WILL YOU BE TEACHING THE BOOK OF REVELATION ANY TIME IN THE NEAR FUTURE?

    CURRENTLY I AM STUDYING JEWISH BACKGROUND OF NT AND STARTING JEWISH GOSPELS AND BEYOND IN NOVEMBER. I AM ASLO STUDYING BIBLICAL HEBREW PART A WHICH WILL COMPLETE IN APRIL 2015.

    I AM VERY INTERESTED IN STUDYING BOOK OF REVELATION FROM YOU

    BENEDICTA NAZARETH

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Please enjoy! We will post new material on Revelation on a regular basis.

    2. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Dear Benedicta, not in the nearest future. We are currently working on other classes. Perhaps later as we are able we will add that on.

      1. BENEDICTA NAZARETH

        Dr Eli
        The way you express the divinity of Christ, his holiness, is just too beautiful for me to be able to express in words. You bring out the most pure meaning of the WORD. I always look forward to reading your notes and comments. This is not just a gift but the anointing of the Holy Spirit.

        Benedicta

  18. Dale Wong

    Thank you for your prompt answer to my last question. I am not as familiar with Metatron as you are. It seems Metatron is always referred to as an ‘angel’ or ‘archangel.’ Hebrews chapter 1 distinguishes Jesus Christ’s inheritance as a ‘son’ to be superior and different to an ‘angel.’ The comparison in Hebrews 1.7 is particularly compelling: καὶ πρὸς μὲν τοὺς ἀγγέλους λέγει ‘and toward on-one-hand the angels says’ and Hebrews 1.8 contrasting it: πρὸς δὲ τὸν υἱόν ‘toward on-the-other-hand the son’. Christians are told they are fellow-sharers as adopted sons. If Metatron is an angel or archangel (and if its theology recognizes no other status), can Metatron still be Jesus Christ?

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Dear Dale,

      Angel Metatron has a special place in Jewish thinking of the Second Temple period. I cannot go into it here in comments, but I think you would really enjoy a few articles in our Links section. Check out the Two Powers section and Enoch and Metatron Traditions.

      1. Dale Wong

        Thanks again, Dr. Eli. I’ll have a look at your Links section

        1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

          Enjoy!

          1. lois stiner

            Dr. Eli,

            I’m taking the eteacher course in January to hopefully master the Hebrew
            study. My many spiritual encounters are clarified in your version of The High Priest
            Tabernacle. My search has been endless.

            Shalom.
            Lois Stiner

  19. Dale Wong

    Dr. Eli: The idea of the Archangel Metatron is a dominant theme in Kabbalah. Does your explanation have its roots in Kabbalah or is this association unnecessary?

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      This all depends on when you think Kabbalah began… Chicken or the egg question. In my opinion, first there were Jewish traditions about Metatron. Then in the Middle Ages came Kabbalah as we know it. We do not lean on those late sources…