The Battle Of Israel’s Shepherds (john 10.1-19)

The Battle of Israel’s Shepherds96003788

1 “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who does not enter the sheepfold by the door but climbs in by another way, that man is a thief and a robber. But he who enters by the door is the shepherd of the sheep. To him the gatekeeper opens. The sheep hear his voice, and he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out. When he has brought out all his own, he goes before them, and the sheep follow him, for they know his voice. A stranger they will not follow, but they will flee from him, for they do not know the voice of strangers.” This figure of speech Jesus used with them, but they did not understand what he was saying to them.

In ancient times, just like today, all kinds of thievery were practiced. Because the Gospel of John was written when people largely grew their own produce and often times raised their own cattle this illustration was rather familiar. It was widely known that if someone wanted to hurt a sheep owner economically, the worst thing that could be done was to let their sheep out under the cover of night and to disperse them. This would take a great deal of time for their shepherd to gather them into the fold again. They could of course steal a few sheep, but it was not possible to steal most of the sheep by persuading them to follow the thief. Thieves could steal what they could carry only after killing the sheep, thereby  destroying the owner’s property. The reason the herd would not follow the thief was simple: They were accustomed to the voice of their shepherd.

As Jesus continued and intensified his polemic discourses with the hoi Ioudaioi, the identity of his person and his mission became abundantly clear. In this very important section, Jesus will recall the image of Israel as God’s sheep, ascribing to the ruling Jerusalemite establishment the role of the evil shepherds of Israel and casting himself as the Good Shepherd of Israel so powerfully described in Ezekiel 34:

1The word of the Lord came to me: “Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel; prophesy, and say to them, even to the shepherds, Thus says the Lord God: Ah, shepherds of Israel who have been feeding yourselves!… My sheep were scattered; they wandered over all the mountains and on every high hill. My sheep were scattered over all the face of the earth, with none to search or seek for them… 10 …I will rescue my sheep from their mouths, that they may not be food for them. 11 “For thus says the Lord God: Behold, I, I myself will search for my sheep and will seek them out… 15 I myself will be the shepherd of my sheep, and I myself will make them lie down, declares the Lord God. 16 I will seek the lost, and I will bring back the strayed, and I will bind up the injured, and I will strengthen the weak, and the fat and the strong I will destroy… 23 And I will set up over them one shepherd, my servant David, and he shall feed them: he shall feed them and be their shepherd. 24 And I, the Lord, will be their God, and my servant David shall be prince among them. I am the Lord; I have spoken.” (Ezek.34:1-24)

So Jesus again said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep. All who came before me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not listen to them. I am the door. If anyone enters by me, he will be saved and will go in and out and find pasture. 10 The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly.

It has been almost habitual to say that here Jesus is speaking about various people who had claimed to be the Messiah before he came. It is true that both before and after Jesus there were a good number of false Messiahs. However, in this context I think this view is misguided. There is no doubt that those who came to the people of Israel before Jesus are the current Jerusalem rulers – the evil shepherds of Israel. They claimed that they alone were the proper entrance. They were the door. If someone was to enter, he must come through them. Jesus says that this is most definitely false. He is the door, not them. He is the only way. If someone will enter through him, he would find refuge (be saved) and sustenance (true life resources). Jesus has only the good of his sheep in mind. Jesus’ very coming had to do with giving new and abundant life.

NOTE: To explore preliminary information about “Introduction to Jewish Studies” 3 months long course with Dr. Eli that will be offered starting February, 2014, please, click HERE.

11 I am the good shepherd.

If we only look at this in the context of a few verses, it is possible to see that only the idea of carrying is involved, but if we consider it in the context of the obvious Old Testament connection with the Ezek. 34, things become clearer: Jesus is Israel’s God who has come to judge and to save.

The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. 12 He who is a hired hand and not a shepherd, who does not own the sheep, sees the wolf coming and leaves the sheep and flees, and the wolf snatches them and scatters them. 13 He flees because he is a hired hand and cares nothing for the sheep. 14 I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me, 15 just as the Father knows me and I know the Father; and I lay down my life for the sheep.

As is obvious from this discourse, the basic difference between Jesus and those who currently ruled Israel was this: He owns the sheep and the other shepherds were hired to care for the sheep. In other words, they are only shepherds because they draw an income. He is the complete opposite. He who owns everything made himself poor and became a servant for the good of the sheep.

We must remember that Jesus continued his previous conversation with a mixed group of people, often addressing his comments to the hoi Ioudaioi present (both those who believed and those who did not believe in him).

For better viewing click HERE.

16 And I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice. So there will be one flock, one shepherd.

This section of the Gospel of John is one of the most memorable and quotable passages in the book. It is normal for someone to speculate that this is  a discussion about the unity of Jews and the Nations (Gentiles in most translations) in this text. It is understood that Jesus is speaking to a Jewish crowd when he says he also has believers among the Gentiles who also need to be reached and brought in under the mighty hand of the Good Shepherd. I think the message is wonderful, but I think it has nothing to do with the Gospel of John’s context and message.

It is far more likely that something entirely different is in view here. As we have already seen, the author of the Gospel of John has Jesus interacting strongly with the passage in Ezek. 34 (evil shepherds vs. the Good shepherd). Only a few chapters later, Ezekiel describes the incredible regeneration/resurrection of Israel that is yet in the future (the vision of valley of the Dry Bones). It is there that we find the key to Jesus’ words in John 10:16:

15 The word of the Lord came to me: 16 “Son of man, take a stick and write on it, ‘For Judah, and the people of Israel associated with him’; then take another stick and write on it, ‘For Joseph (the stick of Ephraim) and all the house of Israel associated with him.’ 17 And join them one to another into one stick that they may become one in your hand… Behold, I am about to take the stick of Joseph (that is in the hand of Ephraim) and the tribes of Israel associated with him. And I will join with it the stick of Judah, and make them one stick, that they may be one in my hand… Behold, I will take the people of Israel from the nations among which they have gone, and will gather them from all around, and bring them to their own land. 22 And I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel. And one king shall be king over them all, and they shall be no longer two nations, and no longer divided into two kingdoms… 24 “My servant David shall be king over them, and they shall all have one shepherd.” (Ezek.37:15-24).

The case is clear. Jesus comes to unite Israel. All Israel. Will the evil shepherds of Israel stand in his way? They will try? Will they succeed? They will not.

17 For this reason the Father loves me, because I lay down my life that I may take it up again. 18 No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to take it up again. This charge I have received from my Father.”

As the time of great confrontation that will result in Jesus’ crucifixion nears, it becomes apparent that the one of the central themes in John’s Gospel is the question of authority. Who is the true authority? For 3 days entire days while Jesus was dead it looked like he had indeed overstepped his authority by boldly criticizing the establishment. But the Gospel prepares its hearers – Jesus’ death will not be because he lacked authority with this being the cause of his trouble. He had the authority to even lay his life down and to take it up again. He received this authority from his Father, the author of life.

19 There was again a division among the Jews because of these words. 20 Many of them said, “He has a demon, and is insane; why listen to him?” 21 Others said, “These are not the words of one who is oppressed by a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?”

Again, Jesus managed to create a sense of division among the hoi Ioudaioi. There were those who accepted him and those who rejected him. The theories about Jesus ranged from demon possession to divine servanthood. The hearer was more and more pressed to choose for himself what to believe about Jesus.

Read PART II

About the author

Dr. Eli Lizorkin-EyzenbergTo secure your spot in our new course “The Jewish Background of New Testament” - CLICK HERE NOW

You might also be interested in:

Simchat Torah: The Joy Of The New ...

By Julia Blum

Still About Sukkot

By Julia Blum

Join the conversation (32 comments)

Leave a Reply

  1. Barbara Glover

    I will be blessed.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Barbara, welcome to our forum!

  2. Angela

    Tada Rabba!!! God bless you……

  3. Ildiko

    Your studies are very useful for me, to understand better the Bible. Before I don’t see the relation between John 10 and Ezekiel 34. For me this is a great revelation. Toda raba!

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      I did not myself when I noticed the connection and there are MORE of it John, I was too amazed.

  4. Its marvelous studies and high knowledge Dr Eli…!

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Thank you, James and welcome to our study group! Dr. Eli

  5. Stephen Lockwood

    Dr Eli;
    You mentioned to Harriet, it is hard to know exactly to whom each of the Gospels were written to. I am not sure where I read it, but I have heard it said that Theophylos, (the one mentioned in Luke and Acts) could have been a son of Ciaphus the High Priest of the Temple. Therefore, it could be said that the two books were written to the hoi Ioudaioi. But then again, this is an unsubstantiated postulation, but one worthy to look into.

    I really enjoy reading your interpretations of the Gospel of John. Please keep at it, though I don’t always agree with you completely, I do enjoy thinking about what you write.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Stephen, hi. Thanks for writing. Just to clarify I do not think that the Gospel was written for hoi Ioudaioi. I think the Gospel was written for an inner Israelite groups of people (Samaritans were certainly an important part of this) for whom hoi Ioudaioi meant something else entirely different that “the Jews” means for us today. What are the reasons behind the Theophilus being the son of Ciaphus? just curious. never heard of it, but willing to consider anything reasonable as possible and then check further. Dr. Eli

      1. Stephen Lockwood

        A growing belief points to Theophilus ben Ananus, High Priest of the Temple in Jerusalem from 37-41 In this tradition Theophilus would have been both a kohen and a Sadducee. That would make him the son of Annas and brother-in-law of Caiaphas, raised in the Jewish Temple. Those who postulate this idea range from early Christian Church greats such as Theodore Hase (1682-1731),and William Paley (1743-1805) to current thinkers such as David L. Allen, Richard H. Anderson, and others. Many of these postulate that the reason for writing to him was that if he became convinced that the “sect” was not a threat, or convinced that Yeshua was the Messiah through the writings, then he could convince the Sanhedrin to quit persecuting the Way.

        1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

          Stephen, shalom. I am interested. Tell me more. What are the key reasons for this theory (that is first question) and what works against it (theory). Let’s keep on thinking together. Dr. Eli

  6. Kat Hobaugh

    Yes it helps me to see and understand how God loved me and protected me from doctrines that opposed faith prior to me hearing the gospel. (The opposite would be I accidentally stumbled onto faith in Jesus in spite of God.) It also helps me understand how and why I recognized Jesus in the gospel message.

  7. tilaye

    Dr.Eli ,
    God bless you varry much i am varry happy to get your Skript and your E- mail
    it is realy a wonderful Beible Chapter . the Shpred John .
    I Love varry much the ´Gospel of John . becaus he Spieks abut Real Love . our world need more and more love and peace . what we need . i lern many things .
    God Bless and protact you and our Holy land . i promis you i keep you infornt of God in my prayer thiem Each day.

    many Greeting from Germany .T.T

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Dear friend, welcome to our study group! Dr. Eli

  8. Marinete Almeida

    The truth is that Jesus opened Jews eyes to make them believe he was the son of God and made a comparison between he and those who had the power and thought they were God. Even being Jesus, the mam who God sanctified and sent to the world, he was called nonsense by the hoi ioudaious, and these didn’t accept his message of peace and salvation ( john 10, 35 and 36). Referring to John 1,11 i cant see any relation to Jesus escape to Galilee ( where he was well treated) in opposite to Judea ( where he was bad treated). I see that John’s citation is more expansive because Jesus was refused by Jews and these were called God people. That’s because its implicit in it:” ….but, to everyone who received him, it was given the power to be son of God.” . So, they can be: Greek, gentile and Jews. That’s because until nowadays, Jesus is accepted by some and refused by others.

    Marinete.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Dear Marinete, Thank you for your thoughtful comment. I think your explanation is plausible and it is another good way to look at it. I think differently on the matter, but I do realize that your view (which is the traditional view) is a viable and possible one indeed. Let us keep thinking together! Dr. Eli

  9. Maria Aurora Asuncion

    Thank you very much. This is the first time I’ve seen a study of these verses in the context of Ezekiel.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Maria, a lot of what you will read you would have seen first time. I emphasize in this study group things that others have not yet explored. Dr. Eli

  10. Jeff Martin

    I was referring to your statement on verse 16 about other sheep of another fold. It seems to me your interpretation goes against your own interpretations of John 3:16 in its relations with Psalm 2 and John 17:20-23 where it talks about all those in the world who will believe being unified.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Jeff, thanks. Can explain how do you think it goes against my interpretation of John 3?

      Blessings, Dr. Eli

  11. Jeff Martin

    Dr. Eli,

    What about the first century Jews was there to say that they were divided? Are you referring to the division between the “Ioudaioi” and the rest? In my opinion I don’t think Jesus would have wante to acknowledge to the leaders that there was a division like that.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      not sure what do you mean.

  12. Deborah G.

    I have heard the “other sheep” stretched to the point of alien life on other planets, even. I am wondering if Samaritans were considered more lowly than goyim in general.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Deborah, read my intro to this commentaries about Samaritans. Let me know if you have trouble finding the material.

  13. Marinete Almeida

    DR. Eli, his reinterpretation makes sense, because Jesus promised from Eden, as a restorer of Israel, as was mentioned by the prophets: Isaiah 9:1-7, and Ezekiel 34 and 11 when God himself says: I myself will seek my sheep “and made ​​in the person of his son. this was confirmed in John with jesus himself saying: I am the good shepherd. and he had full authority to do so. however it was not clear when you say that the message is wonderful but does not have much to do with the Gospel of John’s message context and want it more clear.

    DR. Eli, sua reinterpretação faz todo sentido, porque Jesus , prometido desde o Eden, como restaurador de israel, foi mencionado pelos profetas como: Isaias 9.1-7, e Ezequiel 34 e 11 quando o próprio Deus diz: Eu mesmo buscarei as minhas ovelhas” e o fez na pessoa do seu filho. isso foi confirmado em João. com o próprio jesus dizendo: Eu sou o bom pastor. e ele tinha toda autoridade para fazê-lo. no entanto não ficou muito claro quando voce diz que a mensagem é maravilhosa mas não tem muito a ver com o evangelho de contexto e mensagem de João. gostaria que fosse mais esclarecido.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      What I mean is this: when we say that Gentiles are included into God’s kingdom this is wonderful. BUT there are other passages to get this from, this one has nothing to do with it.

  14. David Hereford

    I am learning to stop and listen, to even lay down my previous teachings and begin with the beginning of his written word. I see the continuation here of Adonai’ words for Israel.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      David, this is a good practice. We must never change or compromise the core (the Gospel we already received), but on the other hand we must be open to another angle and perspective… always.

  15. Harriett

    Hello Dr. Eli, I think your interpretation of the text is brilliant. The automatic assumption is that the Gentiles are the ones that Jesus is referring to. I never considered it in the context that you have presented, yet it makes perfect sense.
    Is what the Church has forgotten is that the Gospels were written to Jews exclusively. Jesus came for the house of Israel. This doesn’t mean that Gentiles are excluded from His blessings, they were promised them by God through Abraham. But the Gospels were to the house of Israel. Forgetting this causes a lot of confusion and misinterpretation, Everyone needs to get back to the Jewish roots and work forward, but instead the Church takes upon themselves the mantle that belongs to Israel.
    Thank You for presenting your insightful and always interesting interpretations.

    1. Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

      Shalom, Harriett.

      Thanks for your encouraging comment. Let me clarify. I think John was written to various types of Israelite movements of whom Israelite Samaritans may have been the central part. When it comes to Luke and Mark, I am yet to consider their audience seriously so at the present moment I do not have I can argue that Luke for example was written to the Jews. (Luke is the hardest because it has an actually Greek-named addressee). Let us keep on thinking together.

  16. Dr. Eliyahu Lizorkin-Eyzenberg

    Do you think my rereading and reinterpretation of this text makes sense? If, yes, why? If, no, why not?

    1. Marinete Almeida

      as it is written in the book of John “came to his own and his own did not receive” I do believe that jesus spoke to the Jewish believers and non-believers as he, Jesus knew who would believe in him and those who reject him. As always your words caused polemics and that was what set him apart from other prophets. What about John quoted Jesus has fulfilled and even those that were not fulfilled remains today awaiting compliance. while the other prophets have gone.

      como está escrito no livro de João “veio para os seus e os seus não o recebeu” creio sim, que jesus falou para os judeus crentes e não crentes pois ele, jesus, sabia aqueles que creriam nele e aqueles que o rejeitaria. Como sempre suas palavras causaram polemicas e foi isso que o diferenciou dos outros profetas. O que João citou a respeito de jesus tem se cumprido e mesmo as que não se cumpriram permanece até hoje no aguardo do cumprimento. enquanto que os outros profetas já passaram.